InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HighRider

11/29/12 11:14 AM

#59178 RE: litton51 #59177

Most likely as we discussed earlier there has been a behind the scenes discussion concerning the definitions. Both parties have now filed motions concerning the invalidity and non-infringement postured by Tmob. I believe this allows the judge to put forth the final Markman and address the Motions, thus wrapping up two issues . At this stage of the game Tmob is essentially trying to get the case dismissed based on what they perceive as being non-infringement. They are doing that by putting forth the argument that the Tmob system of autoswitching does not include what Calypso is claiming the patent covers. I don't believe the judge will come down on Tmobs side at this point.
icon url

Sosa

11/29/12 5:50 PM

#59182 RE: litton51 #59177

Markham is an instruction for the jury and not for people on a message board.