InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

Re: litton51 post# 59177

Thursday, 11/29/2012 11:14:18 AM

Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:14:18 AM

Post# of 60938
Most likely as we discussed earlier there has been a behind the scenes discussion concerning the definitions. Both parties have now filed motions concerning the invalidity and non-infringement postured by Tmob. I believe this allows the judge to put forth the final Markman and address the Motions, thus wrapping up two issues . At this stage of the game Tmob is essentially trying to get the case dismissed based on what they perceive as being non-infringement. They are doing that by putting forth the argument that the Tmob system of autoswitching does not include what Calypso is claiming the patent covers. I don't believe the judge will come down on Tmobs side at this point.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.