Yes. Sometimes the lawyers request more information than they need. In Calypso's case we need enough to show Calypso communicated with Tmob on the patent, Tmob implemented a program that included what the patent proposed and Tmob made x dollars by implementing this program. So rather than have an experts opinion based on data formulated by the expert, Calypso's expert can formulate a value of damages based on Tmob's numbers. From what I have been able to determine from the documents requested and possibly provided, Calypso may have enough information to put together the correct scenario of damages done. I don't think the judge agreeing with Tmob on some of the requests poses any problems for Calypso. An appropriate and realistic valuation can be made. If it presents any problem, it will be negative for Tmob because Calypso can say, if you (Tmob) had provided us the information we had requested we could make a more realistic analysis. This is our analysis based on the numbers you provided and how we had to make the determination we made.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
