InvestorsHub Logo

dia duit

11/26/12 8:20 PM

#337279 RE: janice shell #337277

The judges did NOT rule in Krazy Al's favor. They merely said they didn't want to hear oral arguments

Exactly!

As usual, eggie has the Xers all excited again.

But for entertainment sake, what if the court ruled in Hodges favor? The case goes into the discovery phase, and perhaps the defendants file a counter suit.

eggie confirmed Hodges was questioned by a grand jury. Now this gets very complicated.

We could be waiting YEARS for the outcome of this saga!





jarta

11/27/12 9:58 AM

#337290 RE: janice shell #337277

Janice, ... There was no need for oral argument in front of the 9th Circuit. The law is very clear. Hodges had no facts to support his case and he never was able to plead anything beyond a cockamamie theory.

Even if the dismissal is reversed on a technicality (way beyond my belief!), Hodges will never be able to file a pleading that states a case. ... eom