Replies to post #65994 on Southridge Enterprises Inc (SRGE)

[tradingfunds]

Exactly and that was "Months" Ago and it was done by a Third Party Shareholder which could of been a Large long here or anywhere looking to market the stock or get it exposure. THis is "OLD NEWS" and you, I and many others on this board that have been here awhile know this is "OLD NEWS". We already went over this lol.

You just posted 18 STOCK PROMO NEWSLETTERS COVERING SRGE "FOR FREE" so what does that tell you?????????? No promos, no paid promos going on now nor in many months..... and NO we are not talking about the 1 Paid Promo that was done on SRGE many months ago. Furthermore this is why they still have to "Put that $50K disclaimer" in any and all email alerts for SRGE since they were paid $50K while back to cover SRGE (which we dont even know if they were paid cause I know many promo guys do this to look legit lol or to act like they are working with them 'srge').

Bottomline "ALL PROMOS NOW ARE FREE"

DOZENS OF NEWSLETTERS COVERING SRGE FOR "FREE"

[fear ceoil]

Oops. . . That was me who paid for the promo and who had shares of SRGE .

Just joking
But that statement if it were true, would have filled all the criteria of the disclaimer in the WSIN promo. So SRGE doesn't have to be responsible for third party promotions. (On a side note, I wish only companies could authorize such promotions and third parties be fined for unauthorized promos.)


The point is that reading comprehension is key and SRGE can't be directly connected to promos outside of its PR cycle.


IMO
Best to all.

[zambia123]

8k not required yet

An issuer is required to disclose any material1 definitive agreements entered into (or assumed, other than in connection with a merger or acquisition) other than in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the issuer must disclose any material amendment to a material definitive agreement not made in the ordinary course of business, even if the underlying agreement has not been previously disclosed (e.g., if the underlying agreement was entered into prior to the effective date of the new rules). However, the issuer is not required to disclose any non-binding agreement on Form 8-K, such as a letter of intent that is non-binding on the parties with respect to the underlying transaction, even if it contains some binding, but non- material, elements (such as a no- shop or a confidentiality provision)

[giaiv22]

I'm concerned about all the odd concern or attention bc of 1 promoter paid once who appears to occasionally disburse the PR's or material within to a wider broader base and paid by a completely unrelated 3rd party.

I look on stockpromoters.com and i see one ticker with 95 newsletters and many of them appeared paid and may add up to $500k-$1,000,000 collectively.

SRGE has 1 paid, yet huggeeee attention to it? Why?

Btw. WSIN Has highlighted other tickers - not just SRGE as seen. Unless we've seen every single Doodad they've done that doesn't include SRGE in the text (thus showing up in news tab here), then we really don't know how many tickers they've been compensated for .

And personally, I don't care! Lol.