Replies to post #94390 on Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[Dominion Melchizedek]

PYCT allegedly bought back twice and allegedly tried a 3rd time as a PR stunt. No shell with zero revenues, zero cash, no product sold, ect spends what limited resources they have to buy back token amounts like 300 million shares when the OS is close to 28 BILLION. The whole thing was desperation move to get suckers to buy .0001 the toxice financiers need to unload (received BILLIONS of shares back in 2011 when Preferred were convertdd to commons - BEEELYUNS of em!!).

There are no shorts as the SEC has proven with no FTDs recorded and you cant have a short without a FTDs.

[crazyjerry]

bd, do you believe, then, that PayChest did the 3 purchases separately for that very reason? If so, then they are really on the ball. Tom said quite awhile back, that the iniders were after the shorts, and I didn't quite understand it then, and am not oonviced yet. Someone convice me, because a 100 to 500 billion short is too much for any Market Maker to cover, whether guilty of fraud, or not. I'm quite sure, the SEC nor any other government agency will be capable of forcing complance on the entire shorting issue, maybe for PayChest, if the regulators want to use PayChest as an example, otherwise no way. Also knowing what NP discovered about the DTCC, United Nations and the IMF, the soon-to-be NEW WORLD FINANCIAL ORDER would not allow it, for obvious reasons.