InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Paulness

10/17/05 12:02 PM

#23745 RE: arnold #23743

arnold did you cut and paste or did you type that ,because it shows 3003 year ?
icon url

Jimmy Joe

10/17/05 12:15 PM

#23746 RE: arnold #23743

Not particularly thrilled with the retort from Mr. Wunderlich.

Further,when Plaintiff's management asked for the results of such clinical trials, Defendant Wunderlich responded with the statement, "We will be happy to give you the results of the clinical trials the day after your options run out."

Simply brilliant. (as I shake my head in disgust) Better to have said nothing at all as in "On the advice of legal I cannot comment on this matter."

Much too confident with that quip of a reply. An in your face when it is not called for. Stupid move.

JJM
icon url

spiffy33

10/17/05 8:02 PM

#23758 RE: arnold #23743

But that is what this lawsuit will determine! The "facts" will be different depending on the who's perspective you're reading. Who's facts are correct...I'm sure that the court will make a decision based on the facts that can be substaciated (sp)? Or am I missing something? If so, my apology.
Ellen