InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hyde

11/13/12 8:59 AM

#267132 RE: Krombacher #267131

May be since the JDZ is an "odd duck" entity they have a reduced negotiating position -- maybe they (Sinopec/Total/et al) are playing the three parties (JDZ/San Tome/Nigeria one against the other such as to get their best interests served. Such a negotiation would take longer to get a green light signal (consensus) and so we wait. JMO
icon url

emdyal

11/13/12 10:10 AM

#267134 RE: Krombacher #267131

Yes over 3 years of analyzing since they began drilling Aug 25, 2009 is certainly beyond the pale !
icon url

kingpindg

11/13/12 10:12 AM

#267135 RE: Krombacher #267131

How’s this for a theory on the JDZ…?

Sino-dax is gone from Blocks 2, 3, 4. There is evidence – the Equator Annual Report specifically saying that Sinopec relinquished Block 2; the removal of Blocks, 2, 3 and 4 from the Asset Map on the Addax website – to support this. Sinopec, being the strong, silent type, isn’t going to announce this. And, for whatever reason, the JDA has not officially recognized this, and so, ERHC does not legally have to acknowledge it either.

Total is the only company that can presently make a go of the JDZ and, of course, the JDA would like Total to come in as the new operator for all the blocks. Total would be willing to do so, but we all know that ERHC would need to be carried and Total is not willing to carry ERHC at its current level of interest in the blocks (part of the cost/revenue trade-off you point out).

But, ERHC is not leaving, and why should they? Their interests are secured for at least another decade. However, they know that Total can wait them out, so they are willing to negotiate their percentage interests rather than lose out altogether. But, ERHC knows that the JDA, or at least Sao Tome, does not want to wait another 10+ years, so ERHC says, “Hey Sao Tome/JDA…we are willing to play the game but you guys have to give something here, too.”

And so, that is where we are. In the middle of tedious, back-and-forth negotiations between the JDA, ERHC and Total, trying to get to the “sweet spot” where everyone smiles and shake hands.

Again, just a theory.
icon url

farrell90

11/13/12 11:18 AM

#267140 RE: Krombacher #267131

In my view the JDA allowing Sinopec to remain operator far beyond the extention deadline is one of the best indications of commercial value in the JDZ.

Where is the value?

It could be all in JDZ block 1 where Total and Sinoaddax are partners. Unfortunately that leaves out ERHC.

However it is in JDZ block 2 where Sinopec is the operator and has been allowed to stay past the extention deadline. Another indication of commercial value is ERHC announced they and Addax had encouraged their partner to enter into stage 2 exploration.

I would like to believe the operators Total, Addaax and Sinopec are trying to negotiate better terms for a combined development of the JDZ, but there is no evidence for that.

Time will tell

Good luck Farrell