InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Shell Man

11/10/12 6:47 AM

#48652 RE: Nebula1 #48641

Unaudited? Nebula you sure about that?

I don't recall them saying anything specific about these earings being unaudited....I don't have the link.....can you confirm this is what was said
icon url

zoriden

11/10/12 8:25 AM

#48658 RE: Nebula1 #48641

No need to worry Stuart says that every Qaurter! I've talked to him the last 2.no worries.
icon url

newmedman

11/10/12 8:37 AM

#48659 RE: Nebula1 #48641

They must not have a good sense of time... Q2 was filed way past the 45 day mark... Doesn't he realize that it's public information that he is distorting ?

Sep 26, 2012 Attorney Letter with Respect to Current Information Jun 30, 2012 Active
Sep 25, 2012 Quarterly Report Jun 30, 2012 Active
Jul 3, 2012 Attorney Letter with Respect to Current Information Mar 31, 2012 Active
Jul 3, 2012 Quarterly Report Mar 31, 2012 Active

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MJNA/filings

It would be to their advantage to file sooner than later this time imo..... PR's do not count as a filing...
icon url

Shell Man

11/10/12 9:52 AM

#48665 RE: Nebula1 #48641

Nebula this was on 9 Sept. Before Q2!!

And educated me as well. Why would we be wanting to hear about MJNA earnings information from a CEO of another company? Again this quote was from BEFORE Q2 earnings came out.

Thanks to all who reply on this and if it is a mistake great lets get a moderator in here to clean all this up....
icon url

Shell Man

11/10/12 9:54 AM

#48666 RE: Nebula1 #48641

Moderator please,

Can we looks at all these posts and determine if they are in error and actually pertaining to Q2? This is a VERY delicate subject and into next week could cause a LOT of misinformation and damage and if this is indeed based on Q2 info and not Q3 can we get all these posts on this subject deleted?

Thanks Moderators doing a great job. Stay long on MJNA!!!