InvestorsHub Logo

maybe_this_time

11/07/12 9:59 AM

#13327 RE: mrkirby #13326

As someone who likes to catch and eat an occasional trout in the Aderondaks in upstate NY, I know all about eating mercury fish. I don't want to come off as anti growth, but developing alternate means to generate power and conserve what we have might of interest of future generations. Which appears to be the grand vision here with MVTG's fuel cell technology. We've been watching the Lorax a lot in my household, lol. Yeah, lets keep biggering, lol!

Ecomike

11/07/12 10:52 AM

#13330 RE: mrkirby #13326

Also most people don't realize that CO2 from coal combustion is by far the largest source of CO2 BTU/BTU compared to natural gas, by some huge factor like 2X (I forget the exact number?).

Ecomike

11/09/12 6:27 PM

#13372 RE: mrkirby #13326

Good points!

The news is full of signs that the pendulum has swung back to favor moves that make MVTG a monster!!!!! It is still way undervalued!!!!

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/energy_update

While there was little talk of climate change during the presidential campaign, the number of U.S. voters who see global warming as a serious problem is at an all-time high.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 68% of Likely U.S. Voters now say global warming is at least a somewhat serious problem, including 38% who think it’s Very Serious. Thirty percent (30%) don’t see global warming as a serious problem, with 12% who think it’s Not At All Serious. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

How did you do in this week’s Rasmussen Challenge? Check the leaderboard.

The national survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on November 5, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.