Replies to post #80943 on Inca Designs, Inc. (fka IDGI)

[steinmans80]

Nothing....still loving INCA...maybe that is me wearing my tinted sunglasses....GO INCA

[mzurosky]

Tell that to the 100's being delisted DAILY for failure to meet SEC requirements.

IMO

-Matt

[Haydro]

I've pointed out dozens of times that Inca has no requirements whatsoever to update or post financials.

[oakhill3]

Hi OWG! Everything you quoted is right. I think everyone knows the pinks are a risk (or they should). But I'd be really curious to find out what could happen if a group of investors went after a company head with the purpose of trying to prove that said head deliberately allowed a stock price to be driven into the ground, with total disregard/disdain towards said investors losses, simply because (obviously this is one of a number of guesses we have) that head wanted the company to go private (ie. get rid of the stockholders)and figured this was the best/easiest way to do it. A "Let them Eat Cake" attitude in todays economic environment just doesn't cut it with me. If stockholders started going after companies who deliberately screw them, and started winning (not saying getting any losses back - although the people behind those companies have assets.....), I would like to think maybe companies would think twice before being so callous. Maybe cultivate more responsible behavior? Wishful thinking, but maybe not.....