Replies to post #58524 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[drkazmd65]

I tend to agree with idea that formally assigning Diac the fractional percent ownership of the patent accomplished two things.

Primarily - the removal of any potential objections that could be made by T-Mobile regarding whether (or not) Diac & his Lawyers had a standing to sue.

Secondarily - a signal of sorts that the 28% (+ World-Wide benefits) issue was a non-starter with the Reciever.

Maybe I'm just seeing this glass (such as it is) as half-full by thinking this way? Possibly. But the Reciever would have been just as easily served by stating that in his standing as Reciever (and deciderer) here that the 28% deal with Diac was solid. That would have squelched most objections by T-Mobile as well (IMO).

Keep in mind that Diac does hold a substantial chunk of (likely) legally obtained shares that can't & won't be taken away from him regardless of the decision on what fraction (0.01% or 28%) of the patent he does own.

We get a big settlement or ruling and a big sale on the pantent's value,... he wins bigger than most here just by being among the biggest elephants in the room.

[litton51]

>>And, in any case, it's STILL not true that the Receiver is bound by any fact or fiction in any prior "deal"... fraudulent or not.

OK. Show me where it says this in the court documentation.