InvestorsHub Logo

fourkids_9pets

10/08/12 2:55 PM

#199273 RE: the big guy #199271

i just know my own parameters >> i've never expected *seamless*
from any legit co. on the OTC >> nor do i expect savvy from
a newly public mgmt team >> i give kudos to prior mgmt for
getting JBI and P2O to this level >> i have always respected
innate intelligence .. passion .. curiosity and *awareness*

and as in JBI's case .. a technology that is so compelling
it checks off multiple boxes >> green .. energy .. recycling .. jobs
>> but mostly is a concept easily understood by those who view it

re: those boxes checked off >> it will threaten some >>
but not as many as those who embrace it


my time frame is 2015 to 2020 >> at which point my expectation
is that plastic to fuel/oil is a household term on par with
xerox and kleenex >> the branding is coming >> i have
no doubts >> however the question i have now is which route
does P2O go >> on their own with trusted partners or as an
accretive acquisition >> either way will frustrate some and
delight others >> i'm just happy to be in on the ground floor
of an emerging technology (been there done that and know the drill)

my goal is to continue to acquire JBII shares as funds are available
provided my caveats continue to be met and since i wrote off 2012
on 1.4.12 >> i can live with filings and a TA that can be accessed
regularly while the co.s self imposed end date marches ever closer

4kids: I must give you credit. This post (and the others that follow) actually makes good sense. Things are at the point where one believes in JBI or they don`t. I think recovery , cfp, and profitability is a pretty tall order. I think things just don`t change that quickly.. but it is really a matter of belief and you can`t argue with it. You may want to consider dropping the ~>>*, but your post makes good sense.



==
4kids
all jmo

ponzi_implosion

10/08/12 3:17 PM

#199280 RE: the big guy #199271

Belief can be based on blind faith or on proven performance.

The company has yet to prove that it can perform to anywhere near the capacities and uptime as described in filings and PRs. The company is unwilling to release unedited reports (such as the SAIC document) The company has not released separate fuel production revenue figures.

What the company has released is mostly vague, undefinable fluff such as the recent email from the IR guy and the statments about CFP.

If the company had the goods, IMHO they would have released / touted it long, long ago.