Dear Island, thanks for the question
My only reason to do business with MWR (MSX) was Mr. Brent Johnson and our agreed path of least resistance to achive what thus far has been achieved v. Barrick et al.
At his file
At our file.
Of the essence, was always - no Agreement with Barrick is desired, wanted, possible or an option.
Peter Munk tried to brive me via Vancouverites I lifted Chile proceedings Barrick lifted libel action against me and 200 Million dollars to walk away were offered.
Thanks but no thanks, Chilean law is involved and my clear name and reputation is worth more than Barrick´s assets anyways. Given the sole magnitude of the mining portfolio at my hands.
Barrick was given an olive branch 1996, 2000, 2005 no more.
This is not a fight about money, we have the asset clear and free of ABX and ABX has ahuge legal file promptuary and problem.
We are keen to surrender half of the asset to JV with MSX, be part of MSX and or MSX as one, for we know the asset shall make the company not the other way around.
Mr. Johnson´s Agreement with us, contemplates victory and development of all available assets to MSX via generating financing with Pascua´s reserves when slander of Pascua is lifted by Barrick´s public admission in Canada, as done at a court of law in Chile already. Its SEC filings are criminally tainted with reporting fraudulent material facts at Pascua 1996-2012.
Neither MSX nor me has the right or ability to fend off Bsarrick from trouble with the Chilean Justice system, if I get cash to let them off the hook, I go to jail for abetting fraud and helping to conceal it, for personal gain.
My ethics forfid me from agreeing to take Peter Munk´s brives before, now it is impossible for them to be MSX or join MSX not at Pascua, never.
Barrick owes me personally, more than all its Chile assets combined 1996-2012. Hence, look elsewhere for a bright future.
Barrick is not a winner option, not now, never at Pascua.
Not every thing that shines is Gold. Barrick sure aint MSX is.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
