InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lucky, mydog

10/03/12 9:22 AM

#32324 RE: ticket2mars #32323

I already have all the info I need.

you have certainly made that clear.
icon url

stockmasterflash

10/03/12 9:27 AM

#32325 RE: ticket2mars #32323

How do inside traders get caught?

You know, guys that buy on a tip from a friend of a friend right before a merger. How do they get caught? Doesn't happen? Brokerage and exchange compliance departments don't analyze trades around significant events?

So a shadowy character manages to open up short positions on 5 of 5 stocks that get suspended a day or two or even a week later. He's not going to get caught?

I mean seriously, do you really think exchanges aren't capable of spotting unusual activity like that? A thinly traded penny that has a newly opened short on it right before a suspension? How many accounts would need to be looked at? 5? 10? These are stocks with no significant shorting activity. Any shorting at all in the month before suspension is a flag..period


icon url

BigBake1

10/03/12 9:28 AM

#32326 RE: ticket2mars #32323

Who said it was impossible? Where was the word impossible used in any of my posts? Difficult was used, but difficult is not impossible by any stretch of the imagination.

Nobody posted that the stock was to be suspended within two days, that has been completely fabricated. The statement made was in fact the lack financials make it open for such a suspension, and that has been stated for the last year if not longer in multiple posts. Coincidence with the last post is merely luck of the draw, it could have happened last year when it was brought up.

Logical thought process or critical thinking shows that correlation is not enough to draw a conclusion from. It requires further support because many thing correlate yet have nothing to do with each other.

icon url

236T568

10/03/12 10:13 AM

#32330 RE: ticket2mars #32323

So let me see if I can understand this

you claim that someone that knew that the SEC suspension of GTGP was going to occur on Sept. 17th was shorting the stock beforehand AND posted that the SEC was going to suspend the stock a few days before the suspension?

Why would someone that is shorting a stock want the stock price to go down while he is trying to short it?

On the contrary, the evil shorter would want to stock to be as high as possible before the announcement by the SEC of the suspension....then cover after the SEC announcement when it begins trading.

In reality, if someone knew of the SEC suspension, they would attempt to pump the stock beforehand in order to short it at the highest possible prices.

So the most likely people that knew that the SEC suspension was going to occur would be the ones that were hyping the stock before that announcement. Now who could that be?

icon url

janice shell

10/03/12 1:15 PM

#32332 RE: ticket2mars #32323

I gave an example of how it would be illegal and I'm not saying it happened here or ever has. But when someone post on a board that the proof will happen in two days and it does.

Have you examined what you and others are actually saying? Your theory is that--for no good reason--the SEC tipped off a number of us to an imminent suspension. So we took small short positions. (Believe me, it would have been impossible to get large borrows.)

That would have been illegal insider trading.

And so then we appeared on the GTGP board to WARN people that the stock could be suspended. Right?

Does that make ANY sense to you?? Even on MARS??