InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crow3

10/01/12 1:59 PM

#38534 RE: Crow3 #38533

This s far from a 50-50 toss. CDEX has far from an even chance of becoming profitable. The TROO BLEEVERS are non-existant..except for PERHAPS one or two.

The BK court allowing CDEX a shot came because the creditors DID NOT OBJECT BY MAJORITY..not because they endorsed anything.

It cost them nothing that was not ALREADY LOST..
icon url

pennstreet

10/01/12 3:39 PM

#38535 RE: Crow3 #38533

A reply to a Post>

One cannot look at present management and say one thing about the past! Lol
The lies that we're told by some about Mr Brumfield, shows to what extent some
Will go to to destroy him personally and Cdex!

As far as this 33% interest thing, it was Cdex who was willing to offer the rate, and
At that time, I would have turned down 33%, because the risk was very high to invest
In Cdex! Plus, Mp never honored the loan, lol, imagine that! Plus, does anyone remember
Mr Brumfield suing Cdex for non-payment???

Hum, I did not think so!!!

You said zero, and IMO, you will be wrong, yet, again, lol!!!
That song, the post just repeats again and again!!! Lol!!!