InvestorsHub Logo

wxcbs

09/26/12 9:49 AM

#95292 RE: Tech Writer #95278

Good questions...wish we knew. As far as the media, of which I have been one. True media...CNN,FOX,ABC,CBS,NBC...won't report on anything like that. Why? It's not to market and even though it effects the livesof the trial patients, it doesn't effect the general public like say, the Tylenol scare or something. And I'm just thinking like they would. Now, do you consider the Street.coms or AFs of the world to be "the media", don't know. YES, they should report the full story. Maybe because it happened to us it's a HUGE deal but to "the media" it's not a huge deal. Now, that I owuld like to discuss...not enough space here for that.

eastcoastguy

09/26/12 10:37 AM

#95312 RE: Tech Writer #95278

A question I asked myself yesterday. Researched our filings and the clinical trials.gov site and couldn't find the CRO doing our 2nd stage Lung trial. I found the Indian CRO, SIRI, that did our Catara study. I wouldn't think that is closely held info but maybe it is.

What I do understand about this CRO fiasco is that it happens, not often, but when it does the quilty CRO is responsible for doing a new trial. Though that will cover the cost of the trial it doesn't afford us much comfort in the time and loss stock value which will come along with it. In reading our SEC filings I did find a paragraph related to hiring outside parties to administer clinical trials and the risks involved. To paraphrase,"PPHM is ultimately responsible for problems arising from hiring 3rd party vendors". I took that to mean overall with the FDA but thats my opinion.

I think the talk of hostile or actions triggering a poison pill provision driving the price to high levels is ludicrous. The company is hunkered down with their legal team, the investigation of the fiasco, and evaluating where that leaves them with partnering discussions. IMO they had a strong hand in the early discussion,(pre discovery), but during DD by one of our potential partners the problem was unmasked. This changed the discussions dramatically and probably just put them on hold pending the answers that,we've been told, will be weeks away but not months.

The talk of our large stockholders, Ayer/Dart combining forces for a proxy fight is IMO off also. For all we know they could of sold out in the big flush on Monday....time will tell. Ayer did it once before last winter before the Russell rebalance.

On a positive note, as FTM and others have stated, this investigation might still yield "good data" without a complete do over. Time will cost PPHM if as likely the trial gets redone but if as FTM opines that the MOS is still intact the partner discussions will continue but PPHM will not be in the drivers seat as before. We'll just have to see how it plays out. It certainly is an uneasy time to be a stockholder but this stock has never been an easy hold.

I believe in the field of immunotherapy and my hopes for cancer patients and for us investors is that BAVI works. The volume and rebound yesterday tells me others feel the same way.

hang in there

lurker100

09/26/12 4:11 PM

#95471 RE: Tech Writer #95278

Tech Writer,
AMEN. Especially on keeping this board going with knowledgeable contributors. I love this stock and I love this board. I really can't do without it. Analysis and insight are valuable to me since I have little understanding beyond a bit of the science.
It was Jazzbeerman that got me interested and kept me going for several years until he unfortunately left.
PLease all you good guys (and you know who you are) Stay here.