InvestorsHub Logo

lazyazzdaddy

09/24/12 6:44 PM

#92548 RE: pitadog #92547

When she posted on I-Hub, prior to being booted for some reason, she did not reveal compensation. I don't see that she has anywhere else. Perhaps you could steer us to it. I don't think that is possible, but will retract my opinion upon proof she has. Meanwhile, my opinion is hardly slanderous................



Well, you claimed she was "illegal" I assumed you had some actual proof..?? lmao!

kelseyf

09/24/12 7:05 PM

#92554 RE: pitadog #92547

Yes Cheryl was politely removed, hard to believe someone of her standards and understanding would not post the proper TOS compensation disclaimer - if only she had been straight up at the time when representing her motives and intent for RFMK on behalf of RFMK Management, we could all be participating in some good opinion/discussion in proper fashion and platform.

But she has found a new home that appears not to have the same standards as the IHUB board.

By the way what happened today to RFMK and all that weekend hope and hype of a close over .003 and touch to .004?

Let me chim in.......another promo-pumping chapter has come to the end for RFMK; last week another 143,500,000 shares were removed from the A/S - as in restricted shares - and IMO the table is now set to complete the next dilution move to be announced and updated by the T/A by mid-October.

I predicted to this board that RFMK would again move to the A/S war chest no later then the week of 09/17 and guess what.......true to form Tom came thru!!!!

AIMHO
Kels