InvestorsHub Logo

INET6

10/03/05 11:24 AM

#4600 RE: rottenapple #4597

rottenapple: Third party validation,IMO
Dallas Childrens Hospital
University of Utah Hospital
for Clinician acceptance

University of Michigan Mott's Chidren.s Hospital
bulk mixture certification for pediatrics

University of Michigan Health System
Implementation of the ValiMed Patient Safety Solution and Regulatory Compliance Solutions for injectable medications.

What third psrty verification are you looking for?

Do you want a personal note from the FDA that they have approved it?

Can you honestly believe that the University of Michigan hospitals would risk injecting a patient with an unapproved
solution validation, especially when the previous methode were theoretically hit or miss by the pharmacist.
The word use should assure that further verification is not a problem nor needed for the current uses of ValiMed.

You do know the meaning of implementation and acceptance ,don't you?
In spite of what you say.about taking ones word.I firmly believe all the faith in individuals postings went out the window with Tommyboy. That is the reasons for all the arguments,IMO


d4diddy

10/03/05 2:03 PM

#4608 RE: rottenapple #4597

Rottenapple,

"Did either the company or the hospital make a claim that this was "Third Party Validation"? NO!!! That would be a huge accomplishment worthy of a PR and any company would have capitalized on such great news."

Apparently, Raiderman and Milchip don't understand what "Third Party" means.

There's the maker/seller of the product (First Party) and the receiver/buyer/end-user of the product (Second Party).

A Third Party is an independent entity that can objectively evaluate the product and has no conflict of interest with either other Party.

A fail to see a Third Party mentioned in the PR. Some people aren't being honest with themselves IMO.