Replies to post #57999 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[1110133]

very good and glad you agree, i think to move swiftly through a more fundamental (abstract) proof would have the greatest impact on the courts (backing it up w/ details surely can't hurt).

however, as i have stated, and some have come to agree, a fundmental desire to re-instate the company w/ a new BOD picked by the reciever etc. is a good thing and is the foot that should be put forth w/ the court in a trial to calculate damages.

this may be enabled / hastened if (and perhaps only if) someone were to file a provisional patent extension to '923, hence w/ some creativity and a lot of selflessness an about 150 bucks one could approach the reciever w/ a proposal, based on a provisional patent application that would have the potential to add enough value to the company that the company may be reinstated.

i hope that you and others so skilled will keep this in the back of their minds...

imagine a humongus distribution and still having tons of bucks to re-instate the company--best of both worlds

[woops]

Sir Haggus,

Those parameters can all be included in the "Selective Configuration Capability"

BTW, Ran out of posts yesterday. Exciting.

[Sosa]

Parameters may comprise of: MEID/ESN (authentication), the network protocol used by the communication device and by the Hot spot (802.11 A/B/G/N), the Decibel Amplitude (dBm -100 to -20) strength emitting by the Hot spot, security protocol(WEP/WPA Personal/WPA2 Personal), the frequency of both sides (2.4 GHZ - 11 channels or 5 GHZ - 8 channels)

So here we have at least 27 parameters.