InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 155
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2012

Re: sirhaggus post# 57999

Wednesday, 09/12/2012 2:55:51 AM

Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:55:51 AM

Post# of 60938
very good and glad you agree, i think to move swiftly through a more fundamental (abstract) proof would have the greatest impact on the courts (backing it up w/ details surely can't hurt).

however, as i have stated, and some have come to agree, a fundmental desire to re-instate the company w/ a new BOD picked by the reciever etc. is a good thing and is the foot that should be put forth w/ the court in a trial to calculate damages.

this may be enabled / hastened if (and perhaps only if) someone were to file a provisional patent extension to '923, hence w/ some creativity and a lot of selflessness an about 150 bucks one could approach the reciever w/ a proposal, based on a provisional patent application that would have the potential to add enough value to the company that the company may be reinstated.

i hope that you and others so skilled will keep this in the back of their minds...

imagine a humongus distribution and still having tons of bucks to re-instate the company--best of both worlds
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.