Replies to post #57978 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[litton51]

I read the attachment to the prelim order. It does not indicate whose argument the court supported, item by item. That's what's missing at this point. The text about pagers is also worrying.

I guess like most posters here I expected something more definitive a la "CLYW has an enforceable patent." Instead, the Markman seems to have given an order of definitions that the jury may or may not honor next year at trial. This seems to have kept us in the Sgt. Schultz Box: "I see nothing. I know nothing." What was this entire drill for if not to better define the righteousness of the patent? 3,000 hours in the last ten weeks by CLYW attorneys (at $400/hr/attorney)?

Perhaps in the next day or two some poster who knows what this means can tell us if our chances of ever seeing a dime for our stock have increased or decreased.