InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

Re: txgolf83 post# 57978

Tuesday, 09/11/2012 10:50:49 PM

Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:50:49 PM

Post# of 60937
I read the attachment to the prelim order. It does not indicate whose argument the court supported, item by item. That's what's missing at this point. The text about pagers is also worrying.

I guess like most posters here I expected something more definitive a la "CLYW has an enforceable patent." Instead, the Markman seems to have given an order of definitions that the jury may or may not honor next year at trial. This seems to have kept us in the Sgt. Schultz Box: "I see nothing. I know nothing." What was this entire drill for if not to better define the righteousness of the patent? 3,000 hours in the last ten weeks by CLYW attorneys (at $400/hr/attorney)?

Perhaps in the next day or two some poster who knows what this means can tell us if our chances of ever seeing a dime for our stock have increased or decreased.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.