Replies to post #45365 on Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[gharma]

Yes, my ending comment was directed at the mention of a corrected (?) true DTC position (aka O/S assumed meaning)
And, I understood that was what the next OTCmarkets filings will show (not the DTC un-chill).
No, of the claimed 2000 shareholders some mention on Facebook is not a valid means of information dissemination. If my math is right, and all "likes" are shareholders then 74/2000 is a 3.7% reach, . . . , and we WDRP shareholders pay how much for this sort of limping PR/IR work? That is 96% of claimed shareholders not reached with the news, and no visibility to investors/speculators for whom WDRP is a play somewhere "from background to unknown".
Good to hear the DTC decision, but miserable IR work IMO.

[BeerIsGood]

If DTC agreed to anything, WDRP was involved. WDRP must know the new O/S number that DTC is using. Wonder why WDRP isn't telling us now what it is?