Replies to post #47779 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[rayovac812]

Lol...SWORN testimony under PENALTY OF PERJURY can be considered as evidence

What are you laughing about? That is how it works yes. Stay focused. Testimony can be given on what was said. You can pretend the youtube clip wouldn't be entered as evidence, and testimony given as to its validity. That is when it would fall under the realm of sworn testimony. What you say can be held against you in a court of law. So when you say something, it is evidence. Just because it wasn't said in court is meaningless for purposes of evidence. If needed, it could be used in court. My point was that a lawyer would use what Dr. Fraser said. If they could use it in court, I could certainly use it to justify an investment.

I do however have my doubts that it is all that everyone thinks it is.

Well your argument isn't with me. It is with the Dr. Fraser. What did he say....it made silkworm silk feel like horsehair? It means it is likely the highest grade silk on the planet. You don't have to believe that, but it is HIS testimony...as in testimonial verbiage.

Some folks argue about everything. Dr. Fraser knows what the Koreans said about the silk. If you don't know or care to know, what is the point? Why does a trader care about these finer points? Why isn't it a waste of time?

assuming it can be produced consistently in mass quantities

It is not an assumption. Kim stated that it was "most certainly" being produced. He said it on the CC, and he said it in PR. Why do we bother?