Replies to post #14722 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[SeanBoy]

Prudent,

Sean: There can be no cashless exercise in the manner you have previously suggested, i.e. an exercise at zero.

Really? Then explain this from the 8K!

"(d)Cashless Exercise . Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary (other than Section 1(f) below), for a period of six (6) months from the Issuance Date or, if at the time of exercise hereof a Registration Statement (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement (as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement)) is not effective (or the prospectus contained therein is not available for use) for the resale by the Holder of all of the Warrant Shares, then the Holder may, in its sole discretion, exercise this Warrant in whole or in part and, in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to the Company upon such exercise in payment of the Aggregate Exercise Price, elect instead to receive upon such exercise the “Net Number” of shares of Common Stock determined according to the following formula (a “ Cashless Exercise ”):

Net Number = ((A x B) - (A x C))/B

For purposes of the foregoing formula:

A= the total number of shares with respect to which this Warrant is then being exercised.

B= as applicable:

(i) the Closing Sale Price of the Common Stock on the Trading Day immediately preceding the date of the applicable Exercise Notice if such Exercise Notice is

(1) both executed and delivered pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof on a day that is not a Trading Day or

(2) both executed and delivered pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof on a Trading Day prior to the opening of “regular trading hours” (as defined in Rule 600(b)(64) of Regulation NMS promulgated under the federal securities laws) on such Trading Day, (ii) the Bid Price of the Common Stock as of the time of the Holder’s execution of the applicable Exercise Notice if such Exercise Notice is executed during “regular trading hours” on a Trading Day and is delivered within two (2) hours thereafter pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof or (iii) the Closing Sale Price of the Common Stock on the date of the applicable Exercise Notice if the date of such Exercise Notice is a Trading Day and such Exercise Notice is both executed and delivered pursuant to Section 1(a) hereof after the close of “regular trading hours” on such Trading Day.

C= the Exercise Price then in effect for the applicable Warrant Shares at the time of such exercise."

I'll make it simple for you, if the closing price, B, is 20.4 cents, you have:

((83,000,000 x .204)-(83,000,000 x .074))/.204= 56,960,784 shares would be given to the warrant holders in return for the warrants and IWEB would not get any cash!

Here is the key phase:

...then the Holder may, in its sole discretion, exercise this Warrant in whole or in part and, in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to the Company upon such exercise in payment of the Aggregate Exercise Price, elect instead to receive upon such exercise the “Net Number” of shares of Common Stock determined according to the following formula (a “ Cashless Exercise ”):

[SeanBoy]

How rude of me, I didn't address the rest of your post.

You are on record with your erected "ceiling" on IWEB shares, and we will see how that pans out going forward.

No, the effective cap was errected by IWEB, I merely pointed it out, but I'm certainly not afraid to take ownership of that observation.

While retail investors may get caught up in the hype and drive the pps above 7.4 cents occasionally, I find it hard to believe that major investors are going to pay much more than 8 cents for the stock with 10 cent warrants, but then the existing warrants will have to be reset much lower and the quantity will increase. That's the trouble with toxic finances, it poisons the stiock. The next round of finacing will be very telling.

I am, of course, pleased that you apparently feel that the IWEB PPS will hit .20 before all of the warrants are exercised, from your examples.

How I wish, but alas, it was only an example so that you and others could understand what I was saying. I don't think we'll see 20 cents w/o a reverse split.

The pps is starting to define itself better and I'll talk about that next week, unless no one is interested in my thoughts. In that case I'll keep them to myself.