InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DAI_UY

02/22/03 6:46 PM

#10795 RE: laranger #10792

laranger: My first response last night was that the release looked like documents shared in the course of due diligence for a purchase or perhaps a joint venture that triggered a Reg FD disclosure requirement. The theory advanced by texb is much more plausible to me particularly since not all contracts were filed.

Any due diligence would include every damned thing possible.
icon url

Gamco

02/22/03 7:10 PM

#10798 RE: laranger #10792

laranger -

So you may be suggesting that the 8K may have been made for the benefit of a class in investors that may not previously had access to this information. This would be done to provide a level playing field to ALL investors.

Stated differently, at least one of the industry leaders (read: Nok, Ericy, etc) which has had this information available NOW WANTS TO BECOME AN INVESTOR IN IDCC!!!
These possible investors previously had an advantage over most investors. So before they could buy IDCC shares, all investors need to have access to the same information!

PS: Sorry Tornado