Hi Conrad
Again a misunderstanding
>>>4) If a stock reverses and goes back down, you wait again to purchase more till it goes up.
Unless, of course, at the First Bottom (+ Hick-Up at the Buy Point) all the Reserve Money has been used up for buying. . .or that may have happened at the 2nd or 3rd Bottom(+Hick-Up). Eventually if the stock keeps dropping and recovering with a buy resulting at every hick-up then for every man there comes a point he can not or want not to buy more. . . and then comes the time to either Bail Out or to hope for a Recovery in the future. . .At such points Algorithms are of little use and a Judgement Call will have to be executed.
5) You wait to sell anything till it goes down from a high instead of selling along the way.
People on this Forum . . .would all have a bone or two to pick on this Wait to Sell at the Bottom ???? It’s much better to Buy at the Bottom . . .unless one is Bailing Out <<<<<
RE: 4) Regular AIM would run out of cash much sooner. You are not going all in at the first buy, just what AIM would have directed.
RE: 5) You are NOT selling at a low you are waiting for it to go up and delaying your sell till the stock pulls back a bit. The reverse of his buy rules. So you are pretending you are selling and when it drops back to your last buy point you do a delayed AIM directed sell. So if it goes from 50 to 100 and then pulls back maybe you do your sell as it pulls back to 90.
Toofuzzy
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
