I don't know how far you've read into it, as I'm still reading the application in entirety, too, but the ceramic coating itself is sounding very much like a LMT-based coating, with the elements used.
Edit: Here, I'll quote near the bottom of the first document:
This answers a lot of questions as to Asia problem and the average prices being spent on a phone. This could lead to massive sales of a phone still at a "premium" price but more in line with the middle class of China (which is just a hair above poverty).
Hrrrm, after further digesting and understanding the patent application's wording even more, it's really looking to me that even going to just a metallic coating is not compatible with their current design due to RF-signal problems. In the paragraphs I quoted, they're describing the use of some of the elements of our IP, but also saying directly that metallic elements would not be useful because of their inherent properties of being poor RF transmitters when the signal must pass through the metal. I think this ACE may not be in their deck. Take that how you want, but according to Apple's own patent application, even a limited collector's edition as you're suggesting would induce another "Antenna Gate" with this iPhone's design.
And then looking at the patent application with the company they listed as a vendor for spraying on the ceramic coating, their application states the use of just zirconium and hafnia, with other stabilizing materials of a non-significant percentage.