InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

yamasushi

08/14/12 1:31 PM

#15721 RE: Watts Watt #15720

That is Non-public information and highly illegal. If in fact Ricardo told you that he is an idiot. Also, if in fact he told you that tells me that Lqmt WILL be used in Apple products and Steipp is in fact biding his time... knowing the proverbial sh!t is about to hit the fan!
icon url

ob22

08/14/12 1:32 PM

#15722 RE: Watts Watt #15720

Was that in a phone call watts?
icon url

BBboy

08/14/12 2:46 PM

#15731 RE: Watts Watt #15720

Mr. Watts,

Thanks for the information. I read it in your past posts as well.

1. I believe, as others have indicated, it's illegal to give a shareholder information about an amendment that has not been released to the public. In this I would concur with Yamasushi.

2. I know you have provided some accusations regarding the integrity of Liquidmetal's upper management on this board. Therefore, why would liquidmetal upper management feel compelled to disclose such vital information to a shareholder that has repeatedly raised questions about their character, and management abilities?

3. I don't think we as shareholders know enough about the original licensing agreement, or this amendment to be able to predict accurately what benefits might be in this relationship for Liquidmetal with Apple. Isn't it possible that Salas gave you partial information regarding the amendment?

These above issues lead me to believe that there could be more to this amendment than is being suggested by your post. No offense intended.