When did you go there and review the complaint by Wallace?
The same day?
Or the day after?
What evidence did Wallace provide the Magistrate that the anonymous alias was in fact Spencer?
Or did Wallace just whine, and whine, and whine about how he had been so mistreated to the judge?
Did the judge just pity Wallace and feel sorry for him even though he has NO PROOF that Spencer was the alias that mistreated Wallace?
(BTW, "mistreating" Wallace means that like a spoiled child, any time he doesn't get "special" treatment, he is pitiful...)
Wasn't a copy of Wallace's complaint available for Wallace to post online?
Why not?
Did MacLeod give Wallace a very special thank you and an "atta boy" for Wallace's perversion of due legal process here?
MacLeod is very smart to use a low IQ shill like Wallace. Wallace has no clue that MacLeod will dump him in a heartbeat to protect his own hide. Or is Wallace a stooge, pawn, sycophant, sock puppet, or tool; or all of the above? ROTFLMAO-