InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RickKayne

08/04/12 8:50 PM

#48100 RE: Yak #48096

I hear you. Crazy yeah.
icon url

mfo

08/05/12 12:54 PM

#48110 RE: Yak #48096

"If history tells us anything QS does not have good intentions nor our best interest! Just saying"

Agreed!
You hit the nail on the head, there is nobody looking out for your interests, especially not the PR firm. Add to that list, the CEO, research firms, your broker, and others that are posting. They all want to make $ just like everyone else.

It makes us wonder why QS would post this. The legit way to handle a business dispute is in the courts if they are owed money for services rendered. This certainly would dissuade anyone that does their research to consider hiring QS, when they later follow up on their non-productive PRs with the threat of disclosures.

My guess is that SP finally wised up to the QS cost/benefit, and if QS was paid in stocks that were valued at a higher PPS, then they are unhappy with their compensation.

IMO The only thing worth less than many penny stocks are the leeches that PR them. It is likely that many investors actually took SP moving on from QS as a positive, I know I did.

GLTA & TIVU