InvestorsHub Logo

mfo

Followers 2
Posts 72
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2011

mfo

Re: Yak post# 48096

Sunday, 08/05/2012 12:54:22 PM

Sunday, August 05, 2012 12:54:22 PM

Post# of 52575
"If history tells us anything QS does not have good intentions nor our best interest! Just saying"

Agreed!
You hit the nail on the head, there is nobody looking out for your interests, especially not the PR firm. Add to that list, the CEO, research firms, your broker, and others that are posting. They all want to make $ just like everyone else.

It makes us wonder why QS would post this. The legit way to handle a business dispute is in the courts if they are owed money for services rendered. This certainly would dissuade anyone that does their research to consider hiring QS, when they later follow up on their non-productive PRs with the threat of disclosures.

My guess is that SP finally wised up to the QS cost/benefit, and if QS was paid in stocks that were valued at a higher PPS, then they are unhappy with their compensation.

IMO The only thing worth less than many penny stocks are the leeches that PR them. It is likely that many investors actually took SP moving on from QS as a positive, I know I did.

GLTA & TIVU

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.