John Folger
President
American Community Development Group, Inc.
There is the link to the actual claim that shows it is my personal liability and never had anything to do with the Company. You are correct Admiral, this was brought up months ago. It was also answered months ago during the newspaper turmoil.
There was a refiled a Default Judgment which only shows me personally listed as Defendant on April 11, 2011, not including any other original 2008 Defendants. This document supersedes the original 2008 Default Judgment as far as who is currently liable for the debt.
It is not recorded as a corporate liability of ACDG Inc, nor has it ever been considered a liability of ACDG Inc. Also, it was not recorded on the private company's financial books or included in the corporate records.
As far as I can tell, there are very few companies in the Pinksheets that can even come close to the amount of transparency that this Company attempts to provide.
You mention that you have more questions that need to be answered on order to consider our transparency, so why not list all of them so we can save this boring drip of useless air?
By the way, since you are one of the few people who don't know how to spell my last name, it really isn't too hard to know who you are from previous correspondence. I won't belabor this point.
Since it appears that your interest seems to continually put up random pieces of older information and try to create the illusion that they are new, perhaps you would like to repost all of the information from the February situation and all of the responses, both posted here and the press releases that were published to make sure that we were entirely transparent.
Just recently, a couple of weeks ago, I was called and threatened by a huge disclosure from several shareholders. I find it interesting that none of their information was accurate, just like yours. I wonder where people get all of this accumulated "knowledge", only to find out that it is nothing but air.
Those shareholders were very surprised when instead of capitulating to their request, I hosted a conference call for all of the shareholders to specifically address each and every accusation that they made.
Your continual posting is just more of the same, and possibly the source of continual fiction, rumors, innuendo and fabrication. You might not realize it, but when we increased the authorized number of shares, I had to contact the majority of the shareholders personally. So when I recently spoke directly with the shareholder you posted, I know absolutely that you did not have a phone, email or text conversation with that shareholder, it was a lie. I also know they don't appreciate your posting of their personal info without their permission, so I would be more careful, if I were you.
Since you require transparency from us, how about admitting the actual status of your "takeover" attempt? Please remember that I already disclosed that the money that is owed to me and others by the Company would be conversed to restricted common, and that conversion would easily eliminate any of the possibilities that you so easily throw around. As I said, I am a buyer, not a seller. Your false information about my loading the Matson trust and being an "inside seller" is also just more hot air. Do you need assistance to find the door?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
