"Who said the post was directed solely to you, mom?"
==
Not I, I was just trying to think of a constructive way to handle the part that was directed at me without adding yet another post. In the spirit of fairness, I think one should be able to respond to such posts.
"I don't need to hear anyone's "side of the story"."
==
Fine. We have a "problem". Every time certain people obtain a link to a decent board, it is burned to the ground. They actually seem to enjoy the show. I sure as hell don't give out the links to it - I want to be left alone about it already.
I said here that I was in no position to call for an "ignore". I stated my opinion that I believed a collective ignore would be the only effective solution. My opinion hasn't changed. I haven't demanded that anyone choose sides, or not speak to certain people. I understand that many other posters speak to these individuals on other boards. I haven't said to ignore them there, only in places where they are deliberately attempting to burn the thing down.
Is it possible to have such a place exist without the constant interruption and board burning, or not? Is it asking too much to have a zone free of it? I don't go and try to find and burn down message boards where you all are talking to these individuals. Can I not be extended the same courtesy? I realize no one here can control the actions of others, but we could at least not give out the links to those who seem to enjoy the "show" so much.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
