InvestorsHub Logo

buddyduck

09/15/05 2:57 PM

#30403 RE: RockStar1 #30402

Be careful of this because they will bring your positive perceptions down in-voluntarily also you wont be able to raise their negativity unless they want it pulled up and that wont happen.

My negativity will be gone when the company FINALLY does something in a timeframe they say they are going too.

Joe R

09/15/05 3:04 PM

#30406 RE: RockStar1 #30402

The best way for SCMI to run off the nay sayers is to conduct its business in a professional manner and not allow them to have excuse after excuse to bash company.

While I dont agree with much of anything written by the likes of the people you mention, I think that you as an alleged representative of the company should do more to make sure that the company is meeting its obligations rather than argue for censurship.

The way I see it, if someone is saying something bad/negative about you, if its true fix it, if its not, dont worry about it.

You may well be concerned about future investors reading the posts of the nay sayers and refusing to invest in SCMI. SCMI has to fix this by meeting its business objectives.

Joe.

Holdingthebag

09/15/05 3:14 PM

#30407 RE: RockStar1 #30402

It's not me re-hashing.
It's the media.
Why not follow through, just once, to prove this stuff wrong.
http://p2pnet.net/story/6246


jrinphx

09/15/05 3:29 PM

#30409 RE: RockStar1 #30402

I strongly urge the management of this company to FINISH & FILE!!!!!!!!!!!
Therefore- they have the power to accentuate the positives themselves!!
JR

cgibellino

09/15/05 8:50 PM

#30442 RE: RockStar1 #30402

That is a rediculous post!! The only reason there are negatives is because SCMI created them. Come on, why not admit the faults of the past are still haunting us today. You want good DD then take the bad with the good. At least that way you can get a handle on what is really going on here!