Replies to post #56841 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[Cougar6]

But why would the receiver settle or sell if his mandate from the court was to maximize return?

This is not Christian or Kyle anymore. It is a professional who (should) have no ulterior motive.

[litton51]

My impression of your posts -- strictly subjective, of course -- is that you have since 2009 continued to badmouth our chances of receiving any money for our shares. If the Markman rules that our patent has been valid since 2004, we will hardly be on "bended knees." We will be in the driver's seat pending the outcome of the subsequent infringement trials/sale of the patent. May I ask ... Are you posting for yourself or for former company officers? We shareholders are in a better position now than since 2004.