InvestorsHub Logo

Large Green

06/25/12 7:27 AM

#7700 RE: drrugby #7698

DrR, I would like to thank yo for your reply and your over all points are well taken. I wish I would have followed this more but as you know, there is only so much time in a day.

I like your response to the difference in UWBKQ and WaMu in that the Executive line-up fought for the return of what was taken and/or compensation...yes very simple. A couple last thoughts on your overall view of this. Setting all your emotions aside, what is your view of the outcome, considering some of the players (Judge) involved are all connected in that they work for the Government?

Do you believe UWBKQ proved their point bejond a reasonable doubt? From what I have read (some filings), UWBKQ more than drove their point home and should be rewarded. I believe I read that HJAB did turn the Government's request (typical) down to continue to drag out, waste time and resources. It would appear if this is correct, that this could be read as a good sign INHO.

DrR, again thank you for your time and energy. I hope the best for all concerned here for the court to do the 'right" thing and have a very safe and enjoyable 4th of July Holiday!

hestheman

06/25/12 9:41 AM

#7701 RE: drrugby #7698

drrugby....Agreed! I am very anxious to get the final decision....I think that our attornies have done a great job and they will deserve their share of the judgement when it is handed down soon. July fireworks ahead IMO....GLTA.