InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 203
Posts 13748
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: drrugby post# 7698

Monday, 06/25/2012 7:27:32 AM

Monday, June 25, 2012 7:27:32 AM

Post# of 59621
DrR, I would like to thank yo for your reply and your over all points are well taken. I wish I would have followed this more but as you know, there is only so much time in a day.

I like your response to the difference in UWBKQ and WaMu in that the Executive line-up fought for the return of what was taken and/or compensation...yes very simple. A couple last thoughts on your overall view of this. Setting all your emotions aside, what is your view of the outcome, considering some of the players (Judge) involved are all connected in that they work for the Government?

Do you believe UWBKQ proved their point bejond a reasonable doubt? From what I have read (some filings), UWBKQ more than drove their point home and should be rewarded. I believe I read that HJAB did turn the Government's request (typical) down to continue to drag out, waste time and resources. It would appear if this is correct, that this could be read as a good sign INHO.

DrR, again thank you for your time and energy. I hope the best for all concerned here for the court to do the 'right" thing and have a very safe and enjoyable 4th of July Holiday!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.