InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

therooster

02/13/03 2:38 PM

#2399 RE: hockeydoc5 #2398

I can not find where hasher5 said: "only negative posts are allowed" or "positive posts are not allowed". Why is it that when a positive opinion is posted, it is classified as being so abrasive???
icon url

Big_Tex

02/13/03 3:00 PM

#2401 RE: hockeydoc5 #2398

Correct Hockeydoc. How has LB sustained his lifesyle with no salary for the last four years. Leather jackets and sports cars aren't free. I have always been curious about all of the consultants shares and nothing to show for it except for millions of shares being dumped. Maybe LB can explain that to rooster.
icon url

luvthemtrainz

02/13/03 3:25 PM

#2404 RE: hockeydoc5 #2398

hock: "Yeah right. It's too friggin easy to make those unrecorded side deals w "consultants" and other ilk, and have benefits stream back to the source. Pulleeeeze!"

I've been dancing around that possibility without coming out and saying it. But, I've damned well been THINKING it! How many pukey little outfits were there that came out with one paragraph, self serving NOTHINGS and then merrily cashed in their 250,000 shares? Too many over the years.

Balak must really think he has something going for him by forcing the board's hand on the issue -- knowing full well that the majority of shareholders who know or think they know something are less than amorous of him and his crap. He must also know that Wolf is going to push the SEC thing reallll hard if he smells improprieties.

Show and tell time, Balak. It had better be good, in writing, result in immediate revenues and solid partnerships and totally on the up-and-up.