Replies to post #30524 on Muscle Pharm Corporation (MSLPQ)

[WallStreetWorm]

I agree with your analysis of most likely what happened. You still holding?

[Keith G]

Or maybe what happened was some of these new people involved with MP looked at the numbers and said why would we shed out the money to have are product certified if it has zero impact on sales or the drive of sales or the growth of our company. Im not twisting this in their favor but maybe somebody thinks its not a beneficial business move. I mean let me ask you this (im gonna use random numbers so dont take them literally) but if it would take 20 mil bucks to have everything up to par to get certified and a nsf label put on everything and that produces zero impact on sales what good is it but a loss of 20 mil bucks, I would much rather have them not spend the 20 mil on a nsf logo and continue with the sales as they are, and possibly pay off debt, advertise more, or endorse an athlete (Yes I said it one interview of Bryce Harper in A MP shirt will generate more money then a NSF logo), something that would legitimatly help this company grow. bottom line is this a NSF Logo at this point being on or off of a MP product has ZERO effect. We should all be more upset that we dont know the board members yet, something which really is important to the growth of this compnay.

[Hamham1]

The trend of disregarding the legalities of contracts continues. Some people will make excuses for everything they do but a contract is a commitment. If you are using the NSF logo then you have to abide by their rules. MSLP is using the NSF property. There is no justification for the misuse. The sloppy and entitled behavior continues. It's simply NOT the way to build confidence in your brand or your company.