Replies to post #38002 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[Crow3]

A case of bouncing balls getting cross-winded in the air...

As of now, though JB is offa the hook, ain't gotta go testify..and is able to assure a couple of LONGS that he has stuff under control, and feel like he is gonna comeout OK...One LONG discarded his ACE and drew the three of clubs...and treys ain't wild. Talked to JB and agreed NOT to persue his money owed by CDEX...such a nice thing to do!! Need to award that LONG with a HEROs medal,,,or a dunce cap, one.

JB is one sleek tawker, it seems. AFFABLE and FRIENDLY!! Surely reason enough to buy the shares...right??? LOL!!

SEEMS that Julio 15 is the date of dates...when the final shake doon begins. The JUDGE shall hear alla the PROS and CONS and ponder his decision.. GIVE JB A NEW LISCENSE TO STEAL..or Chop him off with a CHAP7...

(


(Liscense the spelling of the word license by anyone with superior education or background. It refers to taking a poetic liscense in song or written verse. In old english it referred to loosely using the spelling and definition of a word to fit the scheme of what the author was writing or saying.)

[streetpenn]

Perhaps I Missed Something:

I've never heard of a Judge vacating a deposition/discovery order based on the deponent's assertion (upon information and belief) that the attorney for the party seeking discovery was withdrawing.

I guess it's possible that the Court received notification from the withdrawing attorney or from Ryles confirming the withdrawal and it was just not made part of the record. But if that was the case, the motion papers and/or the Order to Vacate would have had a recitation to that effect.

At the very least the Court's Order should have been a postponement (not vacating) of the hearing pending the confirmation of the withdrawal and perhaps a reasonable time to retain new counsel to conduct the deposition.

I have to believe I'm missing something.