Replies to post #38006 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[sea_urchin]

(I wish you'd change your alias!!!!!)

And it's as if we can't get away from that man ... the ad above this space is a Schwab ad: **

STREET SMART EDGE(tm)
See It in Action

But I digress.

I kept thinking there must be another docket with the missing information but no, the numbers were in sequence. And given how thorough the recounting is of everything -- first this, then that -- I re-read them all a few times to see where the verification was hiding, but not there!

There's bound to be something today that will clarify this.

Isn't there?????

I know what a kangaroo court is ... I don't think this is quite that, but what would it be called if no clarification appears?????

** and it's enlarged to the right of the posted post -- arrrggghhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Crow3]

Quite right auld boy. "Information and belief" is not more than an unproved assertation. Only a step above hearsay.

A standard phrase added to qualify a statement made under oath; a phrase indicating that a statement is made, not from firsthand knowledge but, nevertheless, in the firm belief that it is true.

For example, an Affidavit may be needed at some point in a lawsuit even though the individual (whether a party to or a witness in the lawsuit) who has firsthand information is out of the country on business. In many such circumstances that individual's attorney may make an affidavit for him or her. The attorney must indicate that the individual is swearing only to facts that he or she has been told and believes to be true; in other words, on information and belief.

Only ONE explanation that I can see. Somebody paid RYLES off.

Or scared him off..which in light of the fact that RYLES has posted stuff on RB makes the latter seem unlikely. RYLES did not show much fear,,,hesitation maybe,,but not much fear.

Not atall surprising..if true. RYLES lawyer cannot quit..not w/o RYLES sayso and the Judge agreeing. Who would have paid RYLES off? There were nae doot a whole buncha INONITs squirming with dismay at the prospect of what would or could come out at the questioning of JB under oath.

Look again at the list of particulars that were included in the prospective discovery.

RYLES himself was once an INONIT. He may have been a bit afraid of what would come out himself. He could have been culpable.

There remains the problem of explanation of all this in the record. As you say, and Ms. SEA says...sumpin missin here.

The more simple explanation is often the correct one. Is that one just given correct?? Hell, IDUNNO!!! Just remember that we are witnessing a bunch of crooks, at normal business.. for them.