Replies to post #8328 on Global Ecology Corporation (GLEC)

[cleaningup]

You know, Majobuki, you have mentioned him as an insider before as if that is a bad thing. Not sure if you're saying that "insiders" should never post anything? Could you elaborate on your working definition of the term - is an insider employed by the company? Can a person have some "inside" knowledge without being an "insider" because company officials trust you to share certain limited, non-material info within SEC rules?

I guess I leave it to everyone who posts here to be careful about the legality of what they post. If someone crosses a line, it's up to them to deal with any consequences - whether they are pro-GLEC or anti-GLEC.

Technically, IMHO, it is not illegal to have or even divulge material inside info - but trading on that info can be illegal in certain circumstances.

I hope you can just consider the content of what is posted. He readily admits that he is often using conjecture. So much of the info he references is public and he is simply elaborating on its chances. Many of us have tested what he says and found it helpful. If you think he posted something he should not post - then don't trade on it. But it sometimes seems that you don't feel he has a legal right to post?

[ecoman4444]

The EPA works like this....
The registration process involves the applying company submitting data supplied by independent and accredited testing agencies that supports the efficacy of the chemical applications the applying company wishes to register. In the case of copper sulfate, there are many applications already approved, for example use in preserving potable water, the approved EPA rate is 1.3 ppm. This information is readily known and accepted by the EPA, so no additional efficacy testing is necessary. However, when you apply to use the product for an application for which no efficacy data is available, it slows down the process considerably. The applying company must have all this data available for general review before the actual registration process to gauge whether or not ALL uses applied for should be accepted by the agency. Once the company knows there are no objections for most or all of the applications the first phase of field efficacy testing can begin.

Every one of the medium to large companies in the targeted industries is going want to run their own efficacy test to see how it works in their particular process. For individual companies this is not a lengthy process, but if the product is treating something that is going to be consumed by humans, lots of cautioned will be used.

Food safety is one of biggest issues today in this country and across the world and this product has shown great promise in controlling most, if not ALL of the dangerous pathogens that lurk in the microbial world. The meat industry is one that will be begging for solutions very soon (see link below).

http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/30/11941175-testing-for-new-e-coli-strains-in-beef-finally-to-begin?lite