Obviously they were satisfied.
Were they? Maybe they were just giving Ash enough rope.
We may want to critique him, but KA is just an "IR firm" there. yeah, the ceo may very well be a family member with lesser control that an average ceo.
You were right the second time. The CEO is a front man.
Regardless, finra did not make that a KA issue.
You don't think so?
Again, here, many may be confident that the idcn suspension was a KA issue. Do any of us really know the answer though?
I think we do, given the fuss the SEC's been making about hijacked shells lately. And Ash himself is uncharacteristically silent.