InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 212
Posts 22564
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: janice shell post# 66147

Saturday, 05/26/2012 4:38:18 PM

Saturday, May 26, 2012 4:38:18 PM

Post# of 68381
Janice, it was suspended. Of course the sec should be asking questions. Obviously they were satisfied. That's just the basic facts about that. Keep in mind, there is a ceo there. We may want to critique him, but KA is just an "IR firm" there. yeah, the ceo may very well be a family member with lesser control that an average ceo. Regardless, finra did not make that a KA issue. what happens/(happened here) really has no bsuiness having an impact on GA and the other one that KA is solely IR firm (legally non-officer) for.

Again, here, many may be confident that the idcn suspension was a KA issue. Do any of us really know the answer though? No we don't. I may be inclined to agree with you if Indocan was not such an extreme circus act for the 6 or 7 months prior to the Wyoming order. Idcn's 8/2011-4/2012 bazaar behavior was more noticeable that a person dancing nude in church. Seriously, there's a countless amount of idcn dumpsters to go through for the sec. Forget a finra 211. I agree, that's a completely lost cause here.