InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Pedro2004

05/18/12 9:37 AM

#335003 RE: dude iligence #335002

I learned a long time ago not to argue with those that create their own delusional world.

And you’re one of them!



icon url

janice shell

05/18/12 2:49 PM

#335005 RE: dude iligence #335002

pedro the time between the split and the run is not what was or is important for the play...

WHAT?? You just spent three days telling us that it was.

Before CMKX split 2 for 1 the bid was .0001x.0002. There was no other lower option. Not .0001x.00011. Not .00005x.0001 Why because you can't enter 5 digits or decimal places in your stock trades here's the message you will get from Etrade today just as you did back in 2002 or whenever you say the split took place.

Huh? Do you believe you're telling us something we don't know?

Remember many of the shares of CMKX never existed so it was basically free money to the seller.

Untrue. The shares existed. Urbie issued them. They were merely unregistered. Are you another idiot who doesn't understand the difference between selling unregistered stock and shorting naked??

Here's the beauty of the trade the day before the split the stock closed at .0001. The next day you have 40 million shares in your account and guess what the price is still .0001. It splits the price goes to .00005 but wait it can't.

In reality, at that time--September 2003, not "immediately before" the stock had its single run--CMKX was barely trading at all. In the end, though, it did trade at 0.00005 and lower. People traded it actively as low as 0.00002, simply by calling their brokers.