InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flptrnkng

05/16/12 10:56 AM

#183153 RE: Zardiw #183148

PERFORMANCE is the litmus test.





I must say, Bravo, Mr. Bordynuik! Not.
icon url

Long2Retire

05/16/12 11:21 AM

#183166 RE: Zardiw #183148

JB stepping down is one of the primary things that will save this company. His knowledge will be valuable. He should stay as far away as possible from management, operations, and the BOD. PERFORMANCE is the litmus test. We have seen it. With Rauber, there is now a chance to get up to speed.

The value of JB’s 5 million shares will be just fine if he if continues to follow through with JBII’s present course of action.
icon url

snow

05/16/12 11:25 AM

#183170 RE: Zardiw #183148

Zardiw

John has done an amazing job relating to the technical aspects of the porocessor etc. I think he has done a lousy job as a CEO! Production during March was only a low fraction of what we had reason to expect and no explanation has been given. Shredding which would seem to be unnecessary now and the other handling of the waste plastic cost almost as much as the value of the fuel oil and naphta produced. We have had no information that this would be the case. John has been unable to get a revision of the SWP.
icon url

rth

05/16/12 1:19 PM

#183208 RE: Zardiw #183148

It says right in the press release that the SAIC report was necessary to get the financing. One of the main components. I would have wanted the same. SAIC's name means quite a bit. In no way was it unnecessary. Like it or not, that is why it was done.