that's a good find LL, I glossed over that the last time I read the DOT's CAC application pamphlet.
here's the paragraph you are probably referring to, starting at the top of page 22:
let's dissect it a little, particularly the last sentence I find poorly worded.
This requirement may be met by the submission of financial statements, preferably audited, or 10K and/or 10Q reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
to me it doesn't read like the company must produce the SEC filings to meet the requirement. However, I'm sure that the latter looks better than the former to the DOT.
There's a letter from Clay Thomas in the DOT application, pg 104, stating that he audited both 2009 and 2010 financials, so I'm not sure what you mean when you say
this is specifically what Clay says in his letter
also, regarding the three years of financial statement requirement, per the bottom of pg 22 of the pamplet
was pangea petroleum a predecessor company? AAVG gave the DOT 2 years and 9 months of financial statements. is that enough based on the last quote or does the DOT need to see a full three years?