Ah, this brings up another point I've stated before. IF - key word, IF - Inca decided that they didn't see the point in being publically trading (which there is none, IMO), and decided to go private, isn't it true that they would have to buy out the remaining shares?
And if so, wouldn't they want the price per share low?
You don't dilute if you intend to go buy off and go private - that's really the point.
Feel free to let me know if I'm wrong. I honestly don't know. But again, I don't see any reason a small business retail swimwear outlet store in a hotel needs to be public other than someone (previous CEO) wanted to pocket some extra change and found a shell to do it with. It didn't work out for her, it's not working out for Stacy, and it sure as heck isn't working out for us.
By saying NOTHING, and doing NOTHING (in relation to being publically traded), Stacy shows her cards and it's clear, she does not give a flying crap about her company being public. I firmly believe she intends to take this private. And her silence only fuels this belief.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
